Home
What’s in a name? PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 09 April 2008
rathdown.jpgA proposal to change the name of Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council has met with fierce resistance from local politicians in the Dún Laoghaire area who claim the motive behind the suggestion is to split the county rather than to promote unity within it.
Cllr Jim O’Leary (FG) is proposing that the name of the local authority be changed to ‘Rathdown County Council’ as he maintains the existing title of ‘Dún Laoghaire Rathdown’ is both long winded and symbolises the division between the Dundrum and Dún Laoghaire sides of the county.
He will table a motion at this month’s county council meeting that a committee be established to look into the possibility of changing the local authority’s name.
He has also suggested that the name of the local authority be changed to ‘Rathdown County Council’ after the old half Barony of Rathdown.

The barony of Rathdown was split into two following the formation of County Wicklow some 400 years ago. The other half of the barony remained in County Dublin.
The area covered by the old half barony covers the vast majority of the modern day county council area and stretches from Merrion gates in the north, to the border with County Wicklow in the south and as far as Dundrum in the west.
Cllr O’Leary said: “There are people in Dundrum who feel they are just added on to the Dún Laoghaire part. If you ask someone where they are from, very few people are going to say I am from Dún Laoghaire Rathdown because it is very hard to spit it out.
“The name doesn’t suggest a sense of place or of unity and Dún Laoghaire Rathdown suggests two bits bolted together. You are either from one part or from the other.
“We need a name that would unify the whole county and my own view is that it should be called Rathdown,” he added.
In addition he said that from a marketing point of view the council should have a shorter name. He noted the local authority recently decided to move to an abbreviated version of its full title in its logo form of DLR.
The local authority said this logo was used for reasons of “clarity, simplicity and accessibility”.
However, the chairman of the Dún Laoghaire Community Association, Michael Merrigan, dismissed the proposed name change and said the local authority should have originally been called Dún Laoghaire County Council after the administrative capital of the town.
“This proposal would wipe Dún Laoghaire off the map and that would not create unity but further friction,” he said.
“They [the councillors in Dundrum] have this notion that the amount of commercial rates collected in Dundrum is higher than the other side of the county and hence one is subsidising the other. His ultimate reasoning may not be one of unity but rather of fracturing the county.”
Dún Laoghaire based councillor, Jane Dillon Byrne (Lab), said she would be opposed to any change in the current title of the local authority.
“He [Cllr O’Leary] is trying to get publicity for himself,” she claimed. “He is trying to stir up acrimony between the two groups on the council, the one on the inland side and the one that represents the coastal side of the local authority.
“He is being mischievous and I wish he would stop it.”
However, in response to claims that he was trying to split the county, Cllr O’Leary said there were constant clashes between councillors who felt that too much of the council’s money raised in Dundrum was subsequently spent in Dún Laoghaire.
“I am looking for a name that will bring councillors together in an attempt to diffuse the acrimony that is beginning to develop,” he said.
Following the reorganisation of local government in Dublin in 1993, the former Dublin County Council and Dún Laoghaire Borough Corporation were abolished and replaced with three new councils -  Fingal, South Dublin and Dún Laoghaire Rathdown.
Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council was so named because the political reality at the time was that the statutory body known as Dún Laoghaire Borough or Corporation had to be included as part of the new name.
A spokeswoman for the county council said Rathdown was mentioned as a rural district in the list of Irish Local Government Areas 1900 - 1921.
“The document refers to ‘Rathdown No1 Rural District’ which was situated in the rural part of South East County Dublin,” she said.

 
tgi.jpg
Headlines
  • Pause
  • Previous
  • Next
1/5
Environmental activist warns of incinerator 'threat' warning.jpgTHE new Poolbeg incinerator could have serious health implications for Northside residents living downwind of the project, a local environmentalist has claimed.
Bronwen Maher, a member of the Labour Party and former Green Party councillor, warned locals not to be complacent about the incinerator under construction at Ringsend.
Ms Maher has issued a “serious health warning” to Northside residents who believe the proposed mass burn incinerator will not affect them.
She claimed the incinerator would emit dioxins and other highly toxic contaminants downwind towards Clontarf, Sutton, Baldoyle and Howth.
“There are real concerns over the impact this incinerator will have on the health of the local population,” Ms Maher told Northside People.
“Air quality levels in the area will deteriorate with the amount of traffic going to and from the incinerator plant. 
“Furthermore, I believe there was not an adequate assessment of the impact of the development on human health.”
Ms Maher said she did not believe incineration as an option was a bad thing as exporting waste is unsustainable.
However, she believes the plant may prove to be extremely costly for local residents and the taxpayer. 
“When I was on Dublin City Council the issue of the proposed incinerator was an ongoing item for discussion,” she added. 
“My position was that the plant would be over capacity and in the wrong location for transport reasons.”
A spokesman for Dublin City Council said the Dublin waste to energy facility completed extensive statutory assessments by both An Bord Pleanala and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
He pointed out that these addressed the issues of health, traffic and environmental concerns. 
“The EPA will be responsible for the enforcement of the waste licence for the facility which will be operated to EU Directive and EPA licence limits, ensuring that there will be no negative impact on public health or the environment,” he told Northside People.
“In accordance with the requirements of the waste licence, real time data from the facility’s online monitoring system and weekly summaries of continuous emissions monitoring data will be made available to reassure the public that the facility will operate within EU Directive and EPA licence limits.
“In addition, Dublin City Council will impose financial penalties on Covanta, the operators of the Dublin waste to energy plant, for any failure to comply with these strict legal requirements.” 
The spokesman said the majority of the waste going to the plant would access the site via the M50 and Dublin Port Tunnel.
“Approximately, 120 truck movements to and from the site have not had any noticeable adverse effect on traffic,” he added.
Work began on the controversial site last December.
Meanwhile, Dublin North East TD Tommy Broughan (Lab) has called on Dublin City Council to explain the impact of the Poolbeg incinerator on Dublin North East residents.
Deputy Broughan is demanding assurances that the thousands of tonnes of waste planned to be processed at the site will not damage the health of his constituents across the bay.
“The City Manager [John Tierney] needs to explain what measures, if any, the city council is taking to address any serious health, traffic and environmental concerns regarding the proposed Poolbeg incinerator,” he stated.
“Constituents have raised concerns with me over the possible health and environmental impact of the proposed Poolbeg incinerator, especially as Dublin North East is directly downstream of the planned facility.”
Deputy Broughan said the local authority assured him that traffic, health and other environmental items were all addressed during the statutory processes leading to the issuing of the planning permission and the EPA licence.
“I believe that alongside the strict legal permissions and licences that have been approved, Dublin City Council should now clearly come out and reassure residents in Dublin North East on what wider measures have been taken to alleviate the potentially profound downstream effect of this vast new industrial site,” he added.
“In particular we need to know that when the plant is up and running that there will be ongoing strict monitoring of any emissions across Dublin Bay and over the Howth Malahide ward in particular. 
“Mr Tierney should now spell out how precisely this invigilation system will operate and where the monitoring stations will be.”
Read more...
 
AdvertisementAdvertisement

Read our latest editions and digital Archives

digitalarchives.jpg

Island Banners

 

banner-advertisenow-big.jpg

Place your ad

Dublin People Dating

Sponsorship

Newsletter Headlines

Have our latest newsheadlines delivered right to your inbox. Subscribe below.
Name:
Email:


Website Poll

When do you think the next general election will be held?
 
Do you support industrial action by teachers?
 
Should head shops be closed down?
 

Place your Ad Login

Existing Client? Login. Otherwise click place private ad.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register