Home
What’s in a name? PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 09 April 2008
rathdown.jpgA proposal to change the name of Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council has met with fierce resistance from local politicians in the Dún Laoghaire area who claim the motive behind the suggestion is to split the county rather than to promote unity within it.
Cllr Jim O’Leary (FG) is proposing that the name of the local authority be changed to ‘Rathdown County Council’ as he maintains the existing title of ‘Dún Laoghaire Rathdown’ is both long winded and symbolises the division between the Dundrum and Dún Laoghaire sides of the county.
He will table a motion at this month’s county council meeting that a committee be established to look into the possibility of changing the local authority’s name.
He has also suggested that the name of the local authority be changed to ‘Rathdown County Council’ after the old half Barony of Rathdown.

The barony of Rathdown was split into two following the formation of County Wicklow some 400 years ago. The other half of the barony remained in County Dublin.
The area covered by the old half barony covers the vast majority of the modern day county council area and stretches from Merrion gates in the north, to the border with County Wicklow in the south and as far as Dundrum in the west.
Cllr O’Leary said: “There are people in Dundrum who feel they are just added on to the Dún Laoghaire part. If you ask someone where they are from, very few people are going to say I am from Dún Laoghaire Rathdown because it is very hard to spit it out.
“The name doesn’t suggest a sense of place or of unity and Dún Laoghaire Rathdown suggests two bits bolted together. You are either from one part or from the other.
“We need a name that would unify the whole county and my own view is that it should be called Rathdown,” he added.
In addition he said that from a marketing point of view the council should have a shorter name. He noted the local authority recently decided to move to an abbreviated version of its full title in its logo form of DLR.
The local authority said this logo was used for reasons of “clarity, simplicity and accessibility”.
However, the chairman of the Dún Laoghaire Community Association, Michael Merrigan, dismissed the proposed name change and said the local authority should have originally been called Dún Laoghaire County Council after the administrative capital of the town.
“This proposal would wipe Dún Laoghaire off the map and that would not create unity but further friction,” he said.
“They [the councillors in Dundrum] have this notion that the amount of commercial rates collected in Dundrum is higher than the other side of the county and hence one is subsidising the other. His ultimate reasoning may not be one of unity but rather of fracturing the county.”
Dún Laoghaire based councillor, Jane Dillon Byrne (Lab), said she would be opposed to any change in the current title of the local authority.
“He [Cllr O’Leary] is trying to get publicity for himself,” she claimed. “He is trying to stir up acrimony between the two groups on the council, the one on the inland side and the one that represents the coastal side of the local authority.
“He is being mischievous and I wish he would stop it.”
However, in response to claims that he was trying to split the county, Cllr O’Leary said there were constant clashes between councillors who felt that too much of the council’s money raised in Dundrum was subsequently spent in Dún Laoghaire.
“I am looking for a name that will bring councillors together in an attempt to diffuse the acrimony that is beginning to develop,” he said.
Following the reorganisation of local government in Dublin in 1993, the former Dublin County Council and Dún Laoghaire Borough Corporation were abolished and replaced with three new councils -  Fingal, South Dublin and Dún Laoghaire Rathdown.
Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council was so named because the political reality at the time was that the statutory body known as Dún Laoghaire Borough or Corporation had to be included as part of the new name.
A spokeswoman for the county council said Rathdown was mentioned as a rural district in the list of Irish Local Government Areas 1900 - 1921.
“The document refers to ‘Rathdown No1 Rural District’ which was situated in the rural part of South East County Dublin,” she said.

 
tgi.jpg
Headlines
  • Pause
  • Previous
  • Next
1/5
Angry residents oppose DART Underground plan upinarms.jpgOVER 3,500 residents in East Wall are united in their opposition to Irish Rail’s plans for the DART Underground, which will see their area become a building site for the next 10 years due to tunnel boring.
Locals were shocked to learn that East Wall is the only site where tunnel-boring machines will be assembled and launched as part of the construction of twin-bore tunnels.
To add insult to injury, the residents are furious that the area will not even get its own DART station despite having to bear the brunt of the works for the duration of the project should the proposal for the underground rail line go ahead as planned.
Irish Rail had initially proposed that tunnelling would take place at two locations – Inchicore and East Wall. However, tunnelling at Inchicore was dropped for cost saving purposes.
The plans were revealed when Irish Rail recently applied to An Bord Pleanala for a Railway Order.
Angela Broderick, spokesperson for the Protect East Wall action group, said the entire community has been galvanised in its opposition to the plan, which she believes shows a “blatant disregard” for the community.
“The future underground promises to be a comfortable ride for passengers, but for East Wall the delivery of this project means an extremely noisy, vibrating, dust-filled nine-year ride with not even a station provided by way of thanks,” Ms Broderick told Northside People.
“We are absolutely shocked and feel we have been very unfairly treated.
“It seems that East Wall will be dumped with all the tunnelling which will undoubtedly create air and noise pollution, noise vibrations and a constant stream of trucks carrying millions of cubic metres of material through our quiet and settled community.”
Ms Broderick said over 1,000 people have signed a petition opposing the plans and a further 70 group and individual submissions have been lodged to An Bord Pleanala in relation to the plan.
Furious East Wall residents believe the plan for tunnelling at Inchicore was dropped as a result of an intense media campaign by lobby group ‘Inchicore on Track’ prior to the application for the Railway Order.
Members of Protect East Wall have also slammed Irish Rail for a “lack of consultation” on the DART Underground plans.
“Irish Rail would call the meetings we’ve had ‘consultation’ but we would call it more a ‘presentation’ as our voice was not listened to,” Ms Broderick claimed.
However, Barry Kenny, spokesperson for Irish Rail, said there has been “extensive consultation” over the last two years.
“We did a review of the project originally which had four tunnel bores, two from the Inchicore and two from the East Wall side,” Mr Kenny told Northside People.
“There are a number of reasons that we decided against the Inchicore tunnelling.
“Cost saving was the biggest motivation as we will now only be using two tunnel boring machines from East Wall,
“These machines cost tens of millions of euro. Also, the tunnelling would have had a direct structural impact on houses in Inchicore which will not be the case in East Wall, as the tunnelling will take place at the old freight yard.
“Also as a benefit of the freight yard, 75 per cent of the spoil [the material removed as part of the tunnelling] can be taken away by rail, while the remainder can be transported through the [port] tunnel and on the motorways.”
Mr Kenny said the East Wall area does not need a DART station as it is within close proximity to Clontarf and Connolly stations, as well as the Docklands.
“The environmental impact has been very clearly outlined in the environmental report which indicated that the tunnelling won’t have any significant effect on residents,” he added.
“Should there be any type of contamination of the spoil then it will be treated and disposed of appropriately.
“We also feel that in the long-term, human health will be improved as the DART will take vehicles off the roads.”
Dublin Central TD Joe Costello (Lab) and Cllr Emer Costello (Lab) are among those who have made a submission on the plans.
“The original houses in East Wall are almost entirely two-storey and built on land reclaimed from the sea,” a statement from the Costellos read. 
“East Wall lies within the curve of the railway line and is isolated from the rest of the city.
“Due to its low-lying location it has been subjected to flooding, the most recent being last year, 2009.
“Householders find it difficult and expensive to get home insurance.
“East Wall needs sensitive treatment from planners and community benefit from major projects that impact on the area.”
Read more...
 
AdvertisementAdvertisement

Read our latest editions and digital Archives

digitalarchives.jpg

Island Banners

Advertisement

banner-advertisenow-big.jpg

Place your ad

Dublin People Dating

Sponsorship

Newsletter Headlines

Have our latest newsheadlines delivered right to your inbox. Subscribe below.
Name:
Email:


Website Poll

Will you go abroad for your summer holiday?
 
Will Dublin's designation as City of Literature bring in more visitors
 
Should the Government step in to prevent banks increasing mortgage interest rates?
 
Will Dublin finally sneak the All-Ireland through the back door?
 

Place your Ad Login

Existing Client? Login. Otherwise click place private ad.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register